protect a record (against dynamic update)

[Alan Clegg]

On 11/12/14, 8:53 AM, lejeczek wrote:
> hi everybody
> 
> I'd like to ask about possible ways to protect a record - is it feasible
> at all?
> Or maybe some sort of priority mechanisms?
> What I'd like to do is basically to not let DHCP dynamically update a
> record that I set earlier manually. My case is where system has multiple
> interfaces and one has statically configured IP, other interfaces are
> used by qemu guests and this tends to mess things up a bit.

instead of "allow-update {};" use "update-policy {};"

http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch7/xfer.html#update-policy

AlanC


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 535 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20141112/573402c5/attachment.bin>