Bad performance from BIND 9.10 on RHEL 6.5

[Shawn Zhou]

Amir,


No, I haven't found any tunings work on BIND 9.10. I filed a bug (ISC-Bugs #35961) against ISC for them to investigate. By the way, are you running RHEL as well?
Until the performance issue with 9.10 gets fixed, we will stick with 9.9.x.
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 9:10 AM, "amir at localhost.my" <amir at localhost.my> wrote:
 

>
>
>Shawn,
>
>Same with us here. We tested using bind 9.9.5 the recursive queries can reach 10,000 qps and when using 9.10-P1/9.10 .. we only can burst at 3,000 QPS..
>
>Have you find any solution to share with us?
>
>
>Thanks
>
>amir
>
>
>On Saturday, May 3, 2014 4:42:30 AM UTC+8, Shawn Zhou wrote:
>> I was hoping that BIND 9.10 would outperform BIND 9.9.4b1 on RHEL 6.5 but I was surprised to see so much performance drop from BIND 9.10.
>> 
>> 
>> We have been able to send test traffic with 180K qps against 9.9.4b1 without seeing query drops but with 9.10, the query drop rate was 18%. Both of the numbers were obtained with 16 UDP listeners and 24 workers on identical Sandybridge hardware with 24 CPU threads and 24G RAM. Default 12 UDP listeners setting with 9.10 is even
 worse; hence, 16 UDP listeners are used for apple-to-apple comparison.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> We compiled
>>  BIND 9.10 and 9.9.4b1 with the same configuration options.  I also tried '--with-tuning=large' for 9.10 and that didn't really help in our test environment.
>> 
>> 
>> I wonder what type of hardware ISC and test load used to test BIND 9.10. Are there adjustment need to be made for 9.10 to have it perform on par with 9.9.4b1?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  
>
>_______________________________________________
>Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
>
>bind-users mailing list
>bind-users at lists.isc.org
>https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20140527/48bb05ec/attachment.html>