SPF RR type

[Noel Butler]

On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 12:18 -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote:


> Given the heated and bitter debates over the SPF record type (see 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/current/maillist.html, 
> search "SPF", around August of last year), I'm thinking that "a couple 
> years" probably translates into "indefinitely" or even "never".
> 


Agreed, there is one in particular debian dev who is viciously against
the record type, I for one wont be withdrawing it any time


> Some people seem to think the role of the IETF is merely to passively 
> document terrible designs and/or implementations...
> 
>                                                              - Kevin


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20140607/1684302e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20140607/1684302e/attachment.bin>