problem with NS record resolution

[Manuel Ramirez Montero]

Hi,

if the ns record and type A record are in the same zone , is not necesary.
I have configured the forwarders with no values as Mark has told before and
that works fine!!! .

Regards


2014-07-02 14:09 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>:

>
>
> Am 02.07.2014 14:00, schrieb Manuel Ramirez Montero:
> > scgal1                  NS      sipgal1
> > scmol1                  NS      sipmol1
> > sipgal1                 A       10.1.32.224
> > sipmol1                 A       10.1.32.222
>
> why don't you just use FQDN instead "sipgal1" and "sipmol1"?
> that below works fine
>
> dnsbl                           IN NS           dnslists.thelounge.net.
> dnswl                           IN NS           dnslists.thelounge.net.
> dnswl-high                      IN NS           dnslists.thelounge.net.
> dnswl-low                       IN NS           dnslists.thelounge.net.
> dnswl-medium                    IN NS           dnslists.thelounge.net.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe from this list
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20140702/3c27bd6e/attachment.html>