Fwd: Re: weird perfmonce BIND version 9.6

[IT Support]

Hi charles this is what i get from dig

  dig host2.mydomain.com

; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R4 <<>> ost2.mydomain.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 49898
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;host2.mydomain.com            IN      A

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
mydomain.com.             3600    IN      SOA server.mydomain.com. 
postmaster.ost2.mydomain.com 2013092500 10800 3600 604800 38400

;; Query time: 0 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Wed Sep 25 13:40:02 2013
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 119

I don´t know what happend I already added the dns record on both 
external and internal. Another issue when i made a dig from a diferent 
internet lynk  i got a answer from the private ip for the host.




On 25/09/2013 1:05 PM, Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2013, at 10:58 AM, IT Support<it.compilation at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Hi brothers and sisters.
> Hi, anonymous IT Support person--  :-)
>
>> I´m getting some weird perfomance on  BIND version 9.6  I´m running on debian, I have internal and external view created. there are records on internal and external views, so the records on external view some of them are working and others not working.
> That sounds like a misconfiguration of the views, and not a performance problem.
>
>> I´m testing a record created for a host in external view from dns server by a ping and i got a ping: unknown host, but if a ping to other host with external record i got a answer.
> If you want to test DNS, use dig.
>
>> Is there a way to fix this issue?
> Most likely.
>
> Regards,



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20130925/7b87773c/attachment.html>