SPF record with include:

[Jason Hellenthal]

Really I can't see as it would hurt in either SPF/SPF or SPF/TXT

To me it looks to just be a referring URL for those that get a reject based on the SPF rule. Kinda like a comment judging by < & >.

I've not seen it in the wild this far besides this case. Not even in the google for business app references.

Personally I would just drop the http URL and angles.

Thus far I've only really had to use ip4 and 'a' and 'redirect' with no complaints.

-- 
 Jason Hellenthal
 Inbox: jhellenthal at DataIX.net
 Voice: +1 (616) 953-0176
 JJH48-ARIN


On Jun 18, 2013, at 1:56, Julie Xu <J.Xu at uws.edu.au> wrote:

> Hi
>  
> I be asked to add:
> include:otheremailsrv.otherdomain<http://otheremailsrv.otherdomain> 
>  so the TXT records will be looked like:
>                 TXT "v=spf1 mx  include:otheremailsrv.otherdomain<http://otheremailsrv.otherdomain>  ~all"
>  
> Question, from my limited research, I have not found any example to put http part into TXT records, and a little bit worried.
>  
> Could any one advice me if I can put http in spf record like above?
>  
> If so, is my statement right?
>  
> Any comments will be appreciated
>  
> Thanks in advance
>  
> julie
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
> 
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20130618/5003e483/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2529 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20130618/5003e483/attachment.bin>