any requests

[Novosielski, Ryan]

Quite correct (sorry for the top post). I'm surprised, but glad to have learned something. The only difference in the cases I do are that they're MS DNS and the zones I normally use that trick for are forwarded. 



----- Original Message -----
From: Barry Margolin [mailto:barmar at alum.mit.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 01:37 AM
To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at isc.org <comp-protocols-dns-bind at isc.org>
Subject: Re: any requests

In article <mailman.424.1370323734.20661.bind-users at lists.isc.org>,
 "Novosielski, Ryan" <novosirj at umdnj.edu> wrote:

> If it were not already in the cache, I would not need to refresh the cache. 
> Are you absolutely certain? If so, it is possible that this is a difference 
> between BIND and AD DNS (I'm generally trying to refresh AD DNS caches), but 
> I'm nearly certain I've used this to update a cached entry on a BIND-hosted 
> domain. 

Try the following test:

Pick a name that has both A and MX records, but isn't currently in cache.

dig <name> a @server
dig <name> any @server

I have no idea what MS DNS does, but I'm pretty certain that if you 
direct this to the BIND server the second query will only return the A 
record, not the MX record.

-- 
Barry Margolin
Arlington, MA
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users at lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users