New warning message...

[Matus UHLAR - fantomas]

>>This was discussed here already, and imho this is anti-spf bullshit like
>>all those "spf breaks forwarding" FUD. The SPF RR is already here and is
>>preferred over TXT that is generik RR type, unlike SPF.

On 22.07.13 08:50, Barry S. Finkel wrote:
>It is not Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt that "SPF breaks forwarding".
>SPF *DOES* break forwarding.

No, it does not. If a mail gets delivered to address, which is sending it
further ("forwarding it"), the envelope sender has to be changed, because
it's not the original sender who sends the another mail.  Forwarding without
changing envelope address is already broken, it's just people don't care
without SPF. 

>  I have a case I am researching right now
>where forwarded mail is undeliverable due to SPF checking at the
>new destination.

Rewrite the sender's address. You have more choices, SRS is one of them.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Fucking windows! Bring Bill Gates! (Southpark the movie)