Hi there, On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > It's exactly as it says... > > Instead of > ... TXT "SPF ..." > > You now do > > ... SPF "SPF ..." Caution! The SPF record type is near enough dead. See in particular RFC6686 paragraph 5.6; paragraph 6.2; and Appendix A point 4. -- 73, Ged.