disabling lame server logging
Sten Carlsen
stenc at s-carlsen.dk
Tue Feb 26 17:58:55 UTC 2013
On 26/02/13 18:06, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 02/26/2013 11:43 AM, Sten Carlsen wrote:
>>
>> On 26/02/13 15:50, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>>
>>> I would expect that a namecaching server on the mailserver would
>>> reduce traffic and resources all the way around.
>>>
>>> I don't need my mailserver to constantly be asking my name server
>>> about, say, zen.spamhaus.org.
>> This is one reason my mailserver has a DNS server. No forward, that
>> only slows down things.
>> The question here is whether there is a good reason that this
>> instance must not go directly to the roots?
>
> To support systems only visable to your internal view?
I have in my internal view mostly systems that are not visible from the
outside but my internal view has direct access to the world with regards
to DNS. I don't see any risk in that , except the predictability of
RBL-lookups as mentioned elsewhere.
Speed is much improved, even with a standard ADSL line I have better
performance than by forwarding to the ISP DNS server.
>
>
--
Best regards
Sten Carlsen
No improvements come from shouting:
"MALE BOVINE MANURE!!!"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20130226/bc9e8483/attachment.html>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list