rndc refresh fails for signed zones
Chris Thompson
cet1 at cam.ac.uk
Thu Dec 12 15:49:49 UTC 2013
On Dec 12 2013, Thomas Schulz wrote:
>Sorry for the bad advice.
>
>Am I correct in thinking that in the case of a hidden master and a chain
>of slaves, that the first publicly acessable slave would do the signing
>and that in any case only one instance of bind should do the signing?
It would be strange to have signing done in more than one place, yes.
The sort of scenario when you want to do signing on a slave is that
in "Example 2" in https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00626/
--
Chris Thompson
Email: cet1 at cam.ac.uk
More information about the bind-users
mailing list