Bind99 and a slave named server

[Noel Butler]

On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 01:18 -0400, Alan Clegg wrote:

> On Aug 17, 2013, at 12:42 AM, LuKreme <kremels at kreme.com> wrote:
> 
> > [...] I could not get the slave to do anything other than post errors and refuse to start. Usually they were along the lines of not being able to bind to port 953 or of not being able to receive the zone updates.
> 
> Can you provide the actual error messages?  It sounds like there may have been two BIND instances running, but it's definitely not clear by the problem report.
> 



I'm still trying to work out what the hell bind99 is :)
I assume he means 9.0  to  9.9, but yes, without logs........... 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20130817/eec0cfcf/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: face-smile.png
Type: image/png
Size: 873 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20130817/eec0cfcf/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20130817/eec0cfcf/attachment.bin>