No subject
Tue Apr 2 00:56:56 UTC 2013
#ping 192.168.1.61
PING 192.168.1.61 (192.168.1.61) from 192.168.1.254 : 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.1.61: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=28.988 msec
64 bytes from 192.168.1.61: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=16.751 msec
64 bytes from 192.168.1.61: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=6.784 msec
Ping from Linux to Win98, result seems always been consistant.
-----------------------------------------------------------
And vise versa, from Win98 box:
C:\WINDOWS\Desktop>ping 192.168.1.254
Pinging 192.168.1.254 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=255
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.254:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 2ms, Average = 2ms
-----------------------------------------------------------
But I noticed result may not 100% consistant ping
from Win98 to Linux box, accasionaly, especially after
some period of inactivity, it seems I got some packet
loss when pinging from Win98 to RH7.1. That's could
be the reason errors in the log.
Pinging 192.168.1.254 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.254: Destination port unreachable.
Reply from 192.168.1.254: Destination port unreachable.
Reply from 192.168.1.254: Destination port unreachable.
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.254:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 5ms, Maximum = 5ms, Average = 1ms
Isn't that strange? 3 out of 4 packets were unreachable as above,
but Win98 still reports 0% loss?
What could cause such 'unreachable'? I have two Cisco switch
and one Farolon hub, switch/hub configuration problem?
sorry for posting wrong place if this turns out not a dns issue.
thanks.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list