Performance tuning

Adamiec, Lawrence ladamiec at kentlaw.iit.edu
Mon Nov 26 18:12:48 UTC 2012


To the best of my knowledge, there are no problems with our DNS.  We only
host 25 domains.

The report must also address these two specific questions:


   1. Why does www.kentlaw.iit.edu load quicker than kentlaw.iit.edu in any
   browser?
   2. What happens if we remove the forwarders option from named.conf?

I can't duplicate the issue in Q1 and I'm trying to determine a way of
testing Q2.

Larry


On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Doug Barton <dougb at dougbarton.us> wrote:

> What a delightfully vague requirement. :)
>
> I would push back a bit on exactly what problems are attempted to be
> solved here. The BIND defaults are about as efficient as they can be,
> especially so in later versions.
>
> Doug
>
>
> On 11/26/2012 11:01 AM, Adamiec, Lawrence wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been tasked with authoring a DNS report "to achieve optimal
> > performance."  The report must include:
> >
> > CPU usage
> > memory usage
> > bandwidth usage
> > throughput
> > latency
> >
> > I have found some information regarding the number of queries processed
> > per minute but nothing of value for the above areas.
> >
> > Is there some documentation that discusses the above areas?
> >
> > We are running BIND 9.6-ESV-R5-P1, Solaris 10 on a SPARC server.  My
> > report will include the fact we must upgrade from BIND 9.6-ESV-R5-P1
> >
> > Thank you in advance.
> >
> > Larry
> >
> > Lawrence Adamiec
> > UNIX Mgr
> > IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20121126/523ac2cb/attachment.html>


More information about the bind-users mailing list