Permissions change after running dnssec-settime bind 9.9.0rc2

Doug Barton dougb at dougbarton.us
Wed Feb 1 21:16:02 UTC 2012


On 02/01/2012 01:52, Phil Mayers wrote:
> There's no need for the keyfile to be writeable by bind (at the moment,
> at any rate). So root:bind and 0640 seem more appropriate to me.

This makes more sense to me as well. Assume for the moment that an
attacker gains access as user bind. I really don't want them to be able
to munge the key file.


-- 

	It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/




More information about the bind-users mailing list