Mangled secondary records...

[Jeff Justice]

Nevermind.  I get it now.  Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.

Jeff


On Aug 18, 2012, at 3:21 AM, Jeff Justice <listaccount at starionline.com> wrote:

> Hmmm....okay.  It makes me wonder why my primary isn't doing this as well though.  They have been running the same version.
> 
> Jeff
> 
> 
> On Aug 18, 2012, at 2:53 AM, Michael Hoskins (michoski) <michoski at cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> 
>> From: Jeff Justice <listaccount at starionline.com>
>> Date: Saturday, August 18, 2012 12:24 AM
>> To: "bind-users at lists.isc.org" <bind-users at lists.isc.org>
>> Subject: Mangled secondary records...
>> 
>>> I made a change in all of the master records and wanted to force the
>>> slave to update.
>>> 
>>> I deleted all the host files on the secondary and restarted named.
>>> 
>>> It pulls all the domains in and creates new host files, but when you view
>>> the host files for each domain, they appear to be garbled.
>>> 
>>> Running the same BIND version on both primary and secondary.
>>> 
>>> Help!  Secondary is effectively down as a result...
>> 
>> Are you sure you're not just seeing "compiled" zones that are now default
>> in 9.9?
>> 
>> http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/cur/9.9/doc/arm/Bv9ARM.ch06.html#zonefile_form
>> at
>> 
>> http://www.isc.org/software/bind/new-features/9.9
>> 
>> http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Comp/comp.protocols.dns.bind/2012-0
>> 6/msg00094.html
>> 
>> If you really want the old behavior, try your exercise again after adding
>> "masterfile-format text;" to your options clause.
>> 
>> This is a FAQ.  :-)
>> 
>> 
>