dns RR method is not equal balanced?

Lightner, Jeff jlightner at water.com
Tue Mar 29 13:10:25 UTC 2011


Not to mention that RedHat just announced pending EOL of RHEL4 last
week.   RHEL5 has been out since around 2007 and RHEL6 was released
around the start of this year.

 

________________________________

From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water.com at lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water.com at lists.isc.org] On Behalf
Of Ben Croswell
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 8:56 AM
To: Kay
Cc: bind-users at lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: dns RR method is not equal balanced?

 


First and foremost you shouldn't be running any version of BIND 8. That
is way out of date and open to a lot of exploits. 

That being said if by some
-Ben Croswell

On Mar 29, 2011 4:55 AM, "Kay" <chokh at daumcorp.com> wrote:
> Dear my friends.
> 
> I use bind 8.4.7-REL on RHEL 4.4 OS and have thousands of domains.
> 
> In my case ;
> some domain has 12 IPs but traffic of the server is not equal.
> The traffic of 11 IPs is same and just 1 IP is higher than others.
> 
> Today, I moved the dns that is not equal to GSLB(F5) and set 
> address-return 2(Maximum Addresses Returned).
> And then, it's disappeared, equal traffic incoming completely.
> 
> Is there some kind of bugs in bind that I use?
> or any idea?
> 
> Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
 
Proud partner. Susan G. Komen for the Cure.
 
Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments.
----------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
----------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20110329/1a167204/attachment.html>


More information about the bind-users mailing list