Named.conf logical blocks

Phil Mayers p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk
Wed Jun 29 14:05:04 UTC 2011


On 06/29/2011 02:37 PM, Chris Buxton wrote:

> Not entirely. There is at least one construct that looks like this (using your terms):
>
> thing+ block thing block semicolon
>
> For example, within the controls statement:
>
> inet * allow { trusted; } keys { some.key; };

Good point.



More information about the bind-users mailing list