when one view doesn't have the zone
pyh at mail.nsbeta.info
pyh at mail.nsbeta.info
Fri Jan 21 03:09:37 UTC 2011
Mark Andrews writes:
>
> In message <20110121024745.BCD2E2CF86 at mail.nsbeta.info>, pyh at mail.nsbeta.info w
> rites:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> My named.conf looks as:
>> ----------------------------------
>> view "view_a" {
>> match-clients {
>> IP_ADDR_A;
>> };
>> zone "test.com" {
>> type master;
>> file "test.com.a.db";
>> };
>> };
>>
>> view "view_b" {
>> match-clients {
>> IP_ADDR_B;
>> };
>> # doesn't have test.com zone here
>> };
>>
>> view "view_c" {
>> match-clients {
>> IP_ADDR_C;
>> };
>> zone "test.com" {
>> type master;
>> file "test.com.c.db";
>> };
>> };
>> ----------------------------------
>>
>> As you see, test.com doesn't have a zone in view_b.
>> But view_b should be there because other zones may need it.
>>
>> So under this case, when clients from ISP_ADDR_B query for test.com, they
>> will get nothing.
>>
>> How can I resolve this problem? Thanks in advance.
>
> Sometimes you have to workout what you want the answer to be before
> people can tell you how to achieve it. This is one of those times.
>
> What do you want the clients that match view_b to see?
>
Thanks for pointing me.
In fact I want to the clients that match view_b to fall into the default
view, say it's view_c.
Regards.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list