.mil resolution problems?

[Steven Kent]

There was a report on NANOG about this earlier. We are getting
responses, but they were a bit slow to resolve.

Michael Hare wrote:
> Hello-
> 
> Our recursive nameservers are having trouble with .MIL today.  I see
> some public servers [8.8.8.8] are not.  I am not running a dns-sec
> enabled recursive resolver.
> 
> In the below I was expecting an 'ADDITIONAL' section, not based on the
> DIG header, but based on expecting delegation glue.  A dig for the
> NIPR.MIL NS times out.
> 
> Anyone else having problems or can perhaps point me in the right direction?
> 
> Thanks-
> -Michael
> 
> [m7h at trigger ~]$ dig MIL NS
> 
> ; <<>> DiG 9.7.0-P2 <<>> MIL NS
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6544
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
> 
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;MIL.                           IN      NS
> 
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> MIL.                    69821   IN      NS      EUR2.NIPR.MIL.
> MIL.                    69821   IN      NS      PAC2.NIPR.MIL.
> MIL.                    69821   IN      NS      EUR1.NIPR.MIL.
> MIL.                    69821   IN      NS      PAC1.NIPR.MIL.
> MIL.                    69821   IN      NS      CON1.NIPR.MIL.
> MIL.                    69821   IN      NS      CON2.NIPR.MIL.
> 
> ;; Query time: 0 msec
> ;; SERVER: 128.104.254.254#53(128.104.254.254)
> ;; WHEN: Mon Oct 25 15:56:40 2010
> ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 140
> _______________________________________________
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

-- 
------------------------------------
Steven Kent
Chief Technical Officer
onShore Networks
http://www.onshore.com
fingerprint: pub  1024D/D2779F66 2004-04-07