a doubt about dnssec

[Bèrto ëd Sèra]

ignore the request, I already found out that this cannot be applied to an
external untrusted view...

On 10 October 2010 18:38, Bèrto ëd Sèra <berto.d.sera at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> very n00by set of doubts following:
> 1) what's the point in using dnssec, if the secondary nameserver at my ISP
> doesn't use it?
> 2) I see in some guides (for example,
> http://ru.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B9%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%87%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D1%81%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0_(Postfix,_Dovecot,_DSpam,_SQLGrey,_DomainKeys,_SPF)#.D0.9D.D0.B0.D1.81.D1.82.D1.80.D0.BE.D0.B9.D0.BA.D0.B0_BIND_.2F_DNSSEC )
> that a
> key xfer_key {
> algorithm hmac-sha512;
> secret "SECRET-KEY";
> };
> is used. Now shouldn't this be useless in my situation? So I'd simply use
> acl "xfer" {
>         /* This is the secondary DNS to which we will forward all queries
> */
>         x.x.x.x;
> };
> correct?
> 3) I'm serving idn domains (localized domains) is there any special setting
> I should use?
>
> Thanks
> Bèrto
>
> --
> ==============================
> Constitution du 24 juin 1793 - Article 35. - Quand le gouvernement viole
> les droits du peuple, l'insurrection est, pour le peuple et pour chaque
> portion du peuple, le plus sacré des droits et le plus indispensable des
> devoirs.
>



-- 
==============================
Constitution du 24 juin 1793 - Article 35. - Quand le gouvernement viole les
droits du peuple, l'insurrection est, pour le peuple et pour chaque portion
du peuple, le plus sacré des droits et le plus indispensable des devoirs.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20101010/d43d1f6b/attachment.html>