Side-effects of edns-udp-size 512

[Ray Van Dolson]

On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 04:20:30PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 05/03/10 09:34, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> >
> > I believe having edns-udp-size set at 512 gives us maximum
> > compatibility with anything out there behind a broken firewall, etc,
> > though we should look at removing the limit at some point in the future
> > when possible.
> 
> Doing this will simply perpetuate the problem, not solve it.
> 

I do understand that.  However, it's not always a practical stance to
take... :)

Ray