recursion confusion

[David Forrest]

On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Chris Thompson wrote:

> On Jan 8 2010, Rick Dicaire wrote:
>
>> Hi folks, whats the difference between recursion no; and
>> allow-recursion {none;};
>
> Not a great deal, but "recursion no;" changes the default for
> "empty-zones-enable" to "no", while "allow-recursion {none;};"
> doesn't do that. (Probably there are other niggling things I
> have forgotten as well.)
>
>
Another slight difference: (With BIND 9.7.0rc1),
I want 'additional-from-cache no' to curtail upward-referrals and
'additional-from-cache no' is only supported with 'recursion no'

-- 
David Forrest
St. Louis, Missouri