Bind Clustering

[Michael Hare]

Doesn't DDNS rely on a single SOA?  If so, is there a best practice on 
how to deal with this?

-Michael

On 4/8/2010 9:15 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 01:18:33PM +0200,
>   Arnoud Tijssen<ATijssen at Ram.nl>  wrote
>   a message of 14 lines which said:
>
>> Since everything nowadays is dependant on DNS I would like to
>> cluster my primary server in case of a hardware failure or error.
>
> Why? I really do not see your point. You have three authoritative name
> servers (the master and two slaves), presumably in different
> locations. Isn't it enough? If no, you can still add slaves.
>
>> So, how do I setup two primary bind servers that keep each other in
>> sync one way or the other.
>
> Slaves keep in synch automatically.
> _______________________________________________
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users