I have a question concerning the spf

[Matus UHLAR - fantomas]

On 24.08.09 12:04, Faehl, Chris wrote:
> You've specified your policy as "neutral" in your SPF record with "?all". 
> 
> Try "-all", or "+all" if you're not ready to put some meat on your SPF plate. 

I'd object against use of +all, I've read reports about spammers using that
to "exploit" the SPF system. 

I'd advise going to ~all or -all, depending on configuration of his mail
systems. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of fakessh
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 10:32 AM
> To: Bind users; Bind users
> Subject: I have a question concerning the spf
> 
> I use bind, and I have a configuration that seems normal to me on my server
> 
> Here 
> fakessh.eu.	        IN	MX	10    fakessh.eu.
> fakessh.eu.	IN	TXT      "v=spf1 ip4:94.23.60.255 mx mx:fakessh.eu ?all"

add SPF record with the same content.

> problem is when I'm trying to configure my mail server via 
> check-auth at verifier.port25.com  and check-auth2 at verifier.port25.com
> 
> spf field is marked as neutral, also follows senderid as neutral
> 
> how to have the SPF OK, knowing that neutral is not really an answer

Please move this discussion to SPF community mailing lists.
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759