Nslookup not showng TTL

[Mark Andrews]

In message <76D7097B-28A4-4BBB-A2C8-05BF5B822901 at conundrum.com>, Matthew Pounse
tt writes:
> 
> On 15-Oct-2009, at 16:03, John Horne wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:15 -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> >>>
> >> Removing features from nslookup gets us that much closer to KILLING  
> >> and
> >> BURYING it. Forever.
> >>
> > So why does the ISC still distribute it?
> > (Although I guess the answer may simply be "because people still use
> > it".)
> 
> There was a while there that nslookup printed a big warning banner  
> telling you not to use it because it'd been deprecated and would go  
> away any day now.   That doesn't seem to be there anymore, sadly.   I  
> kinda wish it would just vanish.

We lost the battle to get rid of nslookup.

Index: bin/dig/nslookup.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /proj/cvs/prod/bind9/bin/dig/nslookup.c,v
retrieving revision 1.122
diff -u -r1.122 nslookup.c
--- bin/dig/nslookup.c	6 May 2009 23:47:50 -0000	1.122
+++ bin/dig/nslookup.c	15 Oct 2009 12:45:26 -0000
@@ -373,6 +373,7 @@
 					printrdata(&rdata);
 				}
 				dns_rdata_reset(&rdata);
+				printf("\tttl = %u\n", rdataset->ttl);
 				loopresult = dns_rdataset_next(rdataset);
 			}
 		}
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org