Postgres v MySQL v Berkely backend for BIND

[Chris Dew]

Are there performance increases/decreases involved with using a db in
place of bind's normal zone files?

Is there a sqlite3 backend to bind?

Regards,

Chris.

-- 

http://www.finalcog.com/

2009/5/4 David Ford <david at blue-labs.org>:
> I use the DLZ/PG backend and it's rock solid.  I use Ant with a few
> modifications for my front end.
>
> Stephen Carville wrote:
>> I have to bother you all again.
>>
>> I was asked Friday afternoon about using a database with the new BIND
>> servers.  To me it seems using MySQL or PostgreSQL is a bit like
>> hunting rabbits with a howitzer though Berkely DB looks like a good
>> fit.  I can find patches for all three but no real information on
>> reliability or performance.  Performance is not the big deal but
>> reliability and ease of maintenance is.
>>
>> Anyone here have experience or an informed opinion in using a database
>> backend to BIND?
>>
>> This is for BIND 9 on a CentOS or Redhat 5 system.
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>