idsable ipv6 in config?

[Matus UHLAR - fantomas]

> In message <20090730141131.GA30876 at nic.fr>, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:57:16PM +0200,
> >  JINMEI Tatuya / ???? <jinmei at isc.org> wrote 
> >  a message of 25 lines which said:
> > 
> > > I personally don't see a need for it (what's wrong with -4/-6?)
> > 
> > -4 shuts down any v6 service. We would like BIND to be able to *reply*
> > to v6 queries without *generating* them. (For the record, I have the
> > same issue than Gilles.)

On 31.07.09 00:32, Mark Andrews wrote:
> 	Proper use of null routes will allow named to immediately detect
> 	that a IPv6 site is not reachable.  "default" is over used.

oh, although it should work, it's a bit dirty workaround...
it needs a statefull firewall allowing only replies to go out...
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Linux is like a teepee: no Windows, no Gates and an apache inside...