rDNS Round-Robin
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uhlar at fantomas.sk
Wed Jul 22 12:43:25 UTC 2009
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Mark Andrews<marka at isc.org> wrote:
> > RRsets are unordered. Software and configurations should
> > be prepared for this. Where ordering is required it is
> > built into the RR type.
> >
> > Mark
On 14.07.09 14:02, Bryan Irvine wrote:
> I've think I've found the confirmation I was looking for in RFC 2181
> section 10.2.
>
> Does this seem to confirm that round-robin PTR's are perfectly legal?
yes, they are perfectly legal. However I don't know about any application
that would require nor benefit of them, and I don't recommend using them.
With most of applications doing reverse resolution and using its result
anyhow it's still better to have always the same name...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"To Boot or not to Boot, that's the question." [WD1270 Caviar]
More information about the bind-users
mailing list