BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX Records are NOT "Illegal"

[Alan Clegg]

Al Stu wrote:

> ISC’s message that a CNAME/alias in an MX record is illegal is incorrect
> and just an attempt by ISC to get people to go along with what is only a
> perceived rather than actual standard/requirement, and should be removed
> so as not to further the fallacy of this perceived perception of a
> standard/requirement, as it is neither a standard nor a requirement, and
> certainly not illegal.

If you feel this is a bug in BIND, please send an e-mail to
bind-bugs at isc.org for consideration.

Thanks,
AlanC

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20090125/0622d5e9/attachment.bin>