BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX Records are NOT "Illegal"

[Al Stu]

Attachment (hopefully)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Al Stu" <Al_Stu at Verizon.net>
To: <bind-users at lists.isc.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX Records are NOT 
"Illegal"


> Yes, blah was supposed to be srv1.
>
> I do receive both the CNAME and A records for the A mx.xyz.com query.  See 
> attached capture file.
>
> In the capture file three global search and replacements were performed to 
> match the previous example.
>
> 1) domain name was replaced with xyz
> 2) server name was replaced with srv1
> 3) server ip address was replaced with 1.2.3.4
>
> Requirements are met.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Matthew Pounsett" <matt at conundrum.com>
> To: "Al Stu" <Al_Stu at Verizon.net>
> Cc: <bind-users at lists.isc.org>
> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 9:49 AM
> Subject: Re: BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX Records are NOT 
> "Illegal"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users 
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: MX.XYZ.COM.txt
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20090125/0cf70481/attachment.txt>