BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX Records are NOT "Illegal"

[Al Stu]

Yes, blah was supposed to be srv1.

I do receive both the CNAME and A records for the A mx.xyz.com query.  See 
attached capture file.

In the capture file three global search and replacements were performed to 
match the previous example.

1) domain name was replaced with xyz
2) server name was replaced with srv1
3) server ip address was replaced with 1.2.3.4

Requirements are met.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matthew Pounsett" <matt at conundrum.com>
To: "Al Stu" <Al_Stu at Verizon.net>
Cc: <bind-users at lists.isc.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX Records are NOT 
"Illegal"