SERVFAIL issues

[Barry Margolin]

In article <gl3gns$1ish$1 at sf1.isc.org>,
 "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk at iname.com> wrote:

> Sorry for not being more clear.  It's my understanding that "rndc stats"
> dumps only a subset of what ARM provides.  

You still don't make sense.  ARM is documentation, it doesn't provide 
any statistics.  ARM = Administrator's Reference Manual for BIND.

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Frank
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JINMEI Tatuya / $B?@L at C#:H(B [mailto:Jinmei_Tatuya at isc.org] 
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 1:38 PM
> To: Frank Bulk
> Cc: bind-users at isc.org
> Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues
> 
> At Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:37:25 -0600,
> "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk at iname.com> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for the info -- is there a way that there can be feature parity, at
> > least in terms of stats reported, between ARM and "rndc stats"?
> 
> I don't understand the question...what do you mean by 'feature parity
> between ARM and "rndc stats"'?
> 
> Anyway, the fact is that the ARM describes both the output of 'rndc
> stats' and the output from a HTML statistics channel (to some
> extent).  In general, what is described in the ARM should be
> consistent with the actual behavior.  Of course, there can always be
> a discrepancy between a manual (ARM) and the software behavior as long
> as it's done by a human.  Please file a bug report if you find one.
> 
> ---
> JINMEI, Tatuya
> Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar at alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***