split view dns, with a shared dynamic zone?

[Adam Tkac]

On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 08:28:06PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, [iso-2022-jp] JINMEI Tatuya / ¿ÀÌÀãºÈ wrote:
> 
> > So, you at least need to fix one on-memory zone image that can be
> > dynamically updated.  You'll then have to configure the other view where
> > the "shared" zone is a secondary of the real dynamic zone in the other
> > view, or a forward zone for which all queries to be forwarded to the real
> > zone.  (I've not tried this configuration by myself, so I'm not 100% sure
> > if this can implement what you need).
> 
> It's making my brain hurt ;), but I kind of see what you're suggesting. A
> single server both master and secondary for the same zone in different
> views. That should work for the "both the same" part. Then if I configure
> the secondary zone to forward updates to the primary zone both views would
> be the same and clients in either view could update. I guess the primary
> zone would have to be in the view in which the IP of the actual server
> resides, so the forwarded update from the server to itself ( 8-/, will that
> even work?) hits the primary.
> 
> I think it's kind of a deficiency of bind not to support this type of
> configuration more cleanly. It would be nice if you could have both split
> view zones and standalone zones on the same server. Perhaps a feature
> request :)?
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion, I'll play with it and see what happens.
> 

Btw setup with slave zone in second view is described in FAQ as well:
- https://www.isc.org/faq/bind
- Configuration and Setup Questions -> "How do I share a dynamic zone
between multiple views?"

Adam

-- 
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.