Zone updated in one view served from another view

[Chris Buxton]

On Apr 15, 2009, at 6:45 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Will BIND 9.5 do the right thing if a zone file is configured in one
> view, permitting updates through Dynamic DNS, and included in another
> view (without allowing updates)?  If the direct approach (listing the
> zone file twice) does not work, is there some way to achieve this by
> other means?

Listing the zone file twice won't work because the zone is dynamic in  
one view.

Therefore, the only way to achieve this would be to make the "static"  
view a slave of the view that accepts updates. However, if you don't  
already have views set up, this is not a reason - you can just specify  
with the allow-update statement who is allowed to send it dynamic  
updates.

Chris Buxton
Professional Services
Men & Mice