ISC BIND

Alberto Colosi/SI/RM/GSI/it alberto.colosi at sistinf.it
Thu Nov 27 00:07:06 UTC 2008


no, if not I was not writing here.

I compile and run bing from version 4 and I have compiled and runned each 
bind version one by one... 
till today I can't count how many ;)


-------------------------------
Alberto Colosi
IBM Global Business Services
Sistemi Informativi S.P.A.
IT NetWork & Security Department
 *-* *-* *-*
SECURITY IS EVERYONE'S BUSINESS

Member of
IBM Information Security WW CoP






David Ford <david at blue-labs.org> 
27/11/2008 00.52

To
Alberto Colosi/SI/RM/GSI/it <alberto.colosi at sistinf.it>
cc
bind-users at lists.isc.org
Subject
Re: ISC BIND






Is there any indication about why named shuts down immediately in those
logfiles?

-david

Alberto Colosi/SI/RM/GSI/it wrote:
>
> For sure as IBM or Microsoft or an org so big could have!.
> My named.conf is really full of ACL and confs.
>
> my logging channels are:     (but I should find something inside one
> of them or /var/log/messages                 ;) mainly from 9.0 till
> 9.5.1b3 is working! what is different inside 9.6 ????????


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20081127/19bbd27a/attachment.html>


More information about the bind-users mailing list