ISC BIND
Alberto Colosi/SI/RM/GSI/it
alberto.colosi at sistinf.it
Thu Nov 27 00:07:06 UTC 2008
no, if not I was not writing here.
I compile and run bing from version 4 and I have compiled and runned each
bind version one by one...
till today I can't count how many ;)
-------------------------------
Alberto Colosi
IBM Global Business Services
Sistemi Informativi S.P.A.
IT NetWork & Security Department
*-* *-* *-*
SECURITY IS EVERYONE'S BUSINESS
Member of
IBM Information Security WW CoP
David Ford <david at blue-labs.org>
27/11/2008 00.52
To
Alberto Colosi/SI/RM/GSI/it <alberto.colosi at sistinf.it>
cc
bind-users at lists.isc.org
Subject
Re: ISC BIND
Is there any indication about why named shuts down immediately in those
logfiles?
-david
Alberto Colosi/SI/RM/GSI/it wrote:
>
> For sure as IBM or Microsoft or an org so big could have!.
> My named.conf is really full of ACL and confs.
>
> my logging channels are: (but I should find something inside one
> of them or /var/log/messages ;) mainly from 9.0 till
> 9.5.1b3 is working! what is different inside 9.6 ????????
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20081127/19bbd27a/attachment.html>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list