SPF record

[Res]

On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, D. Stussy wrote:

> PS:  Anyone who advocates using a TXT-RR for SPF is more than 2 years behind
> the times and should not be given any respect.  The SPF-RR (type 99) has
> been supported in DNS for 2 years now.  The TXT-RR was a transitional
> mechanism ONLY and is therefore depreciated.

Pitty half the servers testing for it don't know about it.

-- 
Res

If you are not part of the solution, then you are part of the problem!