SPF record

[D. Stussy]

"Res" <res at ausics.net> wrote in message news:geokdr$2q93$1 at sf1.isc.org...
> On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Faehl, Chris wrote:
> ...
> DKIM is like SenderID in that they are both seriously problematic with
> mailing lists, where as SPF is not, which is one reason why I wont be
> doing any DKIM testing on our MTA's, its the reason I dumped SenderID
> checking, now everyones happy :)

Why is domainkeys problematic with mailing lists?  Any mailing list should
validate the poster and when redistributing, regenerate (or remove) the
signature.  There is no problem.  Remember that the signature is to cover
deliver TO the list and not beyond.