How to patch Fedora Core 2 Bind RPM?
Res
res at ausics.net
Wed Aug 13 02:30:55 UTC 2008
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, jri wrote:
> What about Redhat? we are using paid redhat enterprise version, but
> they are still with the version 9.3 and no P2 yet (9.3.4-6.0.2.P1
> available on july 10).
> So end up compiling is not what I thought when buying RHEL.
> Any comments will be appreciated.
Simple, take it up with RedHat, its got nothing to do with ISC, that they
and debian and so on have policies about living in dark ages, but then,
you should be aware of this if you use their distros anyway to make for
these allowances, research a bit more before using those types of distros.
The only Linux flavours that keep complete up to date are the ones that
use upstream sources (like ISC's bind), Slackware (and I heard Gentoo) do
this.
(PS: fanbois of RH/Debian/Ubunut/CentOS/insert_other_variant_here please
dont waste your time with the rhetoric we get about "stableness" and only
why back patch security blah blah blah, if I hear that crap once more I'll
throw up, its old, its boring, if the likes of Slackware can produce a
completely stable and bullet proof distro for well over a decade no reason
others cant)
Res (a RHEL'r as well as a Slackware'r)
More information about the bind-users
mailing list