Why named bind(2)s 0.0.0.0 and :: adresses?

[Mark Andrews]

	FAQ.

> Hi all,
> 
> has anyone here explanation why named bind(2)s addresses 0.0.0.0 and
> :: ? I have this in options statement:
> 
> options {
> ...
>         listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; };
>         listen-on-v6 port 53 { ::1; };
> ...
> };
> 
> but netstat says named listen also on
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:32779            0.0.0.0:*   6898/named
> udp        0      0 :::32780                 :::*        6898/named
> 
> I'm interested why named listen on that ports.
> 
> Adam
> 
> -- 
> Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
> 
> 
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews at isc.org