Root for private network

[Kevin Darcy]

Correction noted. It's legal to have multiple definitions of a zone 
within named.conf, but not within the same view.

- Kevin

Kal Feher wrote:
> zone "." IN { type master;
>         file "rootfile.location";
>         };
> You are now the centre of the universe, keeping Kevin's words in mind that
> you cant also have a zone "." IN { type hint; }; within the same view.
>
>
> On 28/11/07 7:51 AM, "Kevin Darcy" <kcd at chrysler.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Laurent Archambault wrote:
>>     
>>> Hello,
>>> I have a great private network without internet, and for compare actually
>>> configuration of my ROOT(2) to classic ROOT internet,
>>> is it possible to have a example of named.conf for make a good ROOT.
>>> And it's not for hack an root...no !
>>>   
>>>       
>> As far as named.conf goes, you define it like you would define any other
>> master zone.
>>
>> Beyond that, just observe the general rule that a given zone can only be
>> defined once within named.conf, i.e. if you're master or slave for the
>> root zone, you can't also define it as "type hint" or any other type
>> (stub, forward).
>>
>>                  
>>                               - Kevin
>>
>>
>>     
>
>