Reverse dns des not reach my IP

Andy Shellam andy.shellam-lists at mailnetwork.co.uk
Sat Apr 21 18:10:54 UTC 2007


Brilliant!  That makes things much clearer :)

Thanks, I'll save this mail and get something together with my provider 
in the near future!

Andy.

Matthias Wimmer wrote:
> Hi Andy!
>
> Andy Shellam schrieb:
>> Can you explain further on this?
>> I.e. what the ISP will have to put in their zone file and what the OP 
>> would have to put in his zone file?
>
> Reverse lookups for 84.45.66.158 and 84.45.66.159 are made on 
> 158.66.45.84.in-addr.arpa and 159.66.45.84.in-addr.arpa as you 
> probably know. So what your provider has to do at least is to put two 
> CNAME records for this:
>
> 158.66.45.84.in-addr.arpa    IN CNAME <something>
> 159.66.45.84.in-addr.arpa    IN CNAME <something>
>
>> Also would it have to still be an "in-addr.arpa" zone, or could, for 
>> example, the OP put a PTR record in his "mydomain.com" forward-zone?
>
> Technically it can be in any zone, while I have only seen it yet in 
> the in-addr.arpa zone. Resolving might be a bit faster if the CNAME 
> destination is in the in-addr.arpa zone as well if now forward 
> resolution is made on the record. (You will not have to traverse the 
> DNS tree from the root again.)
>
>> Can you give an example of what's needed on both sides?
>
> What I have seen most of the time would be this setup:
>
> On your providers server:
> 158.66.45.84.in-addr.arpa IN CNAME 158.158-159.66.45.84.in-addr.arpa.
> 159.66.45.84.in-addr.arpa IN CNAME 159.158-159.66.45.84.in-addr.arpa.
> 158-159.66.45.84.in-addr.arpa IN NS yourserver.example.com.
>
> And on yourserver.example.com:
> 158-159.66.45.84.in-addr.arpa IN SOA <the typical stuff>
> 158-159.66.45.84.in-addr.arpa IN NS yourserver.example.com.
> 158.158-159.66.45.84.in-addr.arpa IN PTR server1.example.com.
> 159.158-159.66.45.84.in-addr.arpa IN PTR server2.example.com.
>
> This setup is resembling the guides in RFC 2317 that are suggested for 
> Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation.
>
>
> Matthias
>
> !DSPAM:37,462a537589291709913814!
>
>



More information about the bind-users mailing list