About the view function
Niall O'Reilly
Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Fri Apr 6 13:28:49 UTC 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 6 Apr 2007, at 06:17, edwardspl at ita.org.mo wrote:
> There are Clients behind the Internet Server connect to the net...
> So, is it best to config the DNS with view function for the External (
> Internet Server ) and Internal ( Clients PC machine ) ?
> And there is Master DNS and Salve DNS...
>
> Is there an simple sample for the condition ?
As Joe Yao pointed out, there are 'there are several different
ways to set up "split DNS"', so there is no "simple sample".
Besides, split DNS is simply a solution which allows you to make
your domain appear different according to where the query is coming
from (that is, according to who's asking). If you don't need to
show your domain differently in different directions, you don't
need split DNS. That might make life easier for you.
It may be worth thinking about what you need to achieve, and
working from there, rather than starting from features of (certain
implementations of) the technology.
One of the sometimes confusing things about the DNS is that it
really is two different services, needing different, but sometimes
overlapping, treatment. One of these is where a network manager needs
to provide a set of resolving DNS servers for the client systems on
the network he manages. In this case, no master or slave is needed,
and things are very simple. The other is where a domain holder needs
to announce names (and related information) for the domain to the
Internet as a whole, including the internal clients. This is where
authoritative nameservers come in (multiple masters, or a master and
one or more slaves), and possibly (if you really need it) split DNS.
It's important to know where the boundary lies between these two
services, especially if some of your servers are providing both.
If you let us know what you're trying to achieve, we'll be better
able to know how to respond. This might be off-list, as general
DNS concept and design questions are probably off-topic for a BIND
discussion list.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
University College Dublin IT Services
PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFGFksXeYfkja6ZXtkRAi5MAJ9tP2AF8M9/TMjgZn4o76tLSm4TMwCeKwOm
NhzP9qgjc8whSUk0xqlBhmA=
=H2mF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bind-users
mailing list