named listening on UDP
Mark Andrews
Mark_Andrews at isc.org
Wed Apr 4 13:22:10 UTC 2007
> Was the original issue misstated? You said it was "listening" on these
> ports. Outbound queries wouldn't be "listening" - they'd simply be
> established when needed.
TCP connections are established as needed.
UDP sockets have to listen for replies. Named uses the
one socket to talk to remote nameservers. For a nameserver
with any sort of recursive load named would quickly exceed
the OS's ability to supply sockets if it was to open a new
socket for each nameserver it queries.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bind-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounce at isc.org] On
> Behalf Of Tom Schmitt
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 3:51 AM
> To: bind-users at isc.org
> Subject: Re: named listening on UDP
>
> Thank you (and the others) for your answers. This helps me.
> Tom.
>
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:29:55 +1000
> Von: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews at isc.org>
> An: Kal Feher <kal.feher at melbourneit.com.au>
> CC: bind-users at isc.org
> Betreff: Re: named listening on UDP
>
> >
> > This is also in the FAQ.
> >
> > Q: Why is named listening on UDP port other than 53?
> >
> > http://www.isc.org/sw/bind/FAQ.php
> >
> > --
> > Mark Andrews, ISC
> > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews at isc.org
> >
>
> --
> "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ...
> Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
>
>
>
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews at isc.org
More information about the bind-users
mailing list