replicating dynamicly updated servers..

[Stephane Bortzmeyer]

On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 12:34:17PM +0200,
 Gregory Machin <gregory.machin at gmail.com> wrote 
 a message of 15 lines which said:

> I have a master dns server (bind 9) that has 2 zones that clients
> update dynamicly... Bind doesn't allow for slave serve to be updated
> for a dynamic zone ....

Why not regular BIND replication (master sending "notify" and slave
transferring the zone)?

Just keep the "refresh" low so that, even if the "notify" is lost, the
slave won't be too far behind the master.