Does "allow-transfer" work properly?

[AM]

Kevin Darcy wrote:
> AM wrote:

> Also, are you absolutely sure that the "downstream" slave is getting its 
> data from 15.113.159.60? Is there a possibility that it's getting it 
> directly from 112.124.16.162? Maybe it has *both* addresses in its 
> "masters" clause and it's continually failing over.

(shamed)
I'm very stupid.
Yes you're correct. The last slave pulls the data directly from the master and not from the slave "in the middle".
Thanks.