Configuration about bind name serser.

Gregory Hicks ghicks at cadence.com
Mon May 29 17:09:22 UTC 2006


> From: Robert Spangler <lazydog at zoominternet.net>
> To: "Bind-Users" <bind-users at isc.org>
> Subject: Re: Configuration about bind name serser.
> Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 12:38:38 -0400
> X-CanItPRO-Stream: outgoing
> 
> On Thu May 25 2006 18:39, Barry Margolin wrote:
> 
> >  >             I am Sandip Kumar ghosh. I have bind9 base name server with
> >  > static IP. My OS is FreeBSD4.10. I have a register domain like
> >  > <mydomain.com>. In my domain there are two nameserver like
> >  > <ns1.mydomain.com> & <ns2.mydomain.com> with the two public IP. In my
> >  > name server I put the diffrent 55 public web server IP. From which ur
> >  > web site is controling. when i put the command "dig www.mydomain.com",
> >  > my ns reply me the hole 55 IP with round robin base , which is declear
> >  > my name server. My requerment is when i put the command "dig
> >  > www.mydomain.com" the name server reply me atlest 10 IP of this 55 IP
> >  > as a round robin. Each request the name server reply the differnt set
> >  > of 10 IP from the privious reply.
> >
> >  Ordinary BIND cannot do this.  You'll need to modify the source
> >  code yourself, or use a different nameserver.
> >
> >  With that many sites, maybe you should be using a service like
> >  Akamai.  They have a fancy, custom DNS architecture that is
> >  designed for distributing load across lots of different servers.
> 
> I may be off in left field here but I thought Bind could already do
> this.  The process was simple too if I remember correctly.
> 
> www.mydomain.com  A 10.0.0.1
>      10.0.0.2
>      10.0.0.3
>      10.0.0.4
>      10.0.0.5

Actually, this should be:

www.mydomain.com.   IN A 10.0.0.1
                    IN A 10.0.0.2
                    IN A 10.0.0.3
                    IN A 10.0.0.4
                    IN A 10.0.0.5
next.example.com.   IN A 10.0.0.6

You forgot the " A " in subsequent records and trailing dot on the www
line...

Is the "IN" strictly necessary?  No, but putting it in does indicate
what type of record it is for...

> And so forth.....  Bind would then round robin the IP addresses I thought.  
> Like I said I might be out in left field here. :)
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Regards
> Robert
> 
> Smile... it increases your face value!
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory Hicks                           | Principal Systems Engineer
Cadence Design Systems                  | Direct:   408.576.3609
555 River Oaks Pkwy M/S 6B1             | Fax:      408.894.3479
San Jose, CA 95134                      | Internet: ghicks at cadence.com

I am perfectly capable of learning from my mistakes.  I will surely
learn a great deal today.

"A democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding on what to have for
lunch.  Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the results of the
decision." - Benjamin Franklin

"The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they
be properly armed." --Alexander Hamilton



More information about the bind-users mailing list