Zone reload time after NOTIFY

Kevin Darcy kcd at daimlerchrysler.com
Wed May 24 21:06:51 UTC 2006


Scott, Casey wrote:

> 
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: bind-users-bounce at isc.org 
>>[mailto:bind-users-bounce at isc.org] On Behalf Of Barry Margolin
>>Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 1:14 PM
>>To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at isc.org
>>Subject: Re: Zone reload time after NOTIFY
>>
>>In article <e52ai1$a32$1 at sf1.isc.org>,
>> "Scott, Casey" <Casey.Scott at wizards.com> wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I am not concerned specifically with disk operations or the 
>>>      
>>>
>>internal 
>>    
>>
>>>transfer mechanics of BIND. That's working fine. I just 
>>>      
>>>
>>want to reduce 
>>    
>>
>>>the amount of time it takes for a newly transferred zone to become 
>>>available via the name resolution provided by the BIND server.
>>>This effort is focused on getting BIND to match the responsiveness 
>>>that the current Windows DNS infrastructure provides.
>>>      
>>>
>>So if you do a "dig domainname.com soa @slave" after it logs 
>>that it has transferred the new version, it still shows the 
>>old serial number?
>>
>>--
>>Barry Margolin, barmar at alum.mit.edu
>>Arlington, MA
>>*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
>>*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>I can't get it to reproduce that behavior now!!! I have made the exact
>change I was performing yesterday over 15x. Changes are immediately 
>available via name resolution. Yesterday, when everything was newly 
>installed (RHEL4 U2 & BIND 9.2.4), there was at least a 20 minute 
>delay. Any idea what could have been going on?
>
Are you sure that your lookup tool wasn't failing over to the next 
nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf?

- Kevin





More information about the bind-users mailing list