needed library for 9.3.2 that wasn't needed for 9.3.1.

Christopher L. Barnard cbar44 at tsg.cbot.com
Fri Mar 31 14:40:14 UTC 2006


On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Mark Andrews wrote:

> >
> > I am upgrading to version 9.3.2 on several of my Solaris 9 servers from
> > version 9.3.1.  I notice that the named 9.3.2 binary requires the
> > libgcc_s.so library.  Previous versions did not -- I would build the
> > binary on a server with a compiler and move the binaries to a production
> > server that does not.  I do not have gcc installed on my production
> > servers, so libgcc_s.so does not exist.  Is there a way to build Bind
> > version 9.3.2 so that it does not require the libgcc_s.so library to run?
>
> 	Don't build with gcc. Other than that install the library on the
> 	other machine.

Just about all of the other applications puke if I try to compile them
with the Sun compiler -- they specify gcc.  I have compiled 4.x up to
9.3.1 with gcc.  What is wrong with gcc?  I don't even have a Sun compiler
anymore on my build server.

Since the library is architecture-specific, I don't think I can just copy
the library file from one server to another.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Christopher L. Barnard         O     When I was a boy I was told that |
| cbarnard at tsg.cbot.com         / \    anybody could become president.  |
| (312) 347-4901               O---O   Now I'm beginning to believe it. |
| http://www.cs.uchicago.edu/~cbarnard                --Clarence Darrow |
+----------PGP public key available via finger or PGP keyserver---------+



More information about the bind-users mailing list