hint zone or forward ?
cmic
cmic at caramail.com
Fri Jul 7 12:06:53 UTC 2006
Hello.
I am using Bind 9.3.1 under Linux for a private zone "dom.prv"
in which clients cannot resolve anything but "dom.prv"
But now I want the clients to be able resolve another private
zone named "iq". I solved the problem by inserting this
in my named.conf (i think the rest of named.conf is of no use
for the matter...)
...
zone "." {
type hint;
file "interne/db.root";
};
...
And the db.root file is :
@ 0 SOA iq admin\server.iq (
2006090201 ; serial
1H ; refresh
2H ; retry
4W ; expire
1D ) ; minimum
;
IN NS ns.iq.
ns.iq IN A 172.21.16.254
It works as expected: The commands 'host abc.dom.prv' and
'host macine.sub.iq' both yieds correct answers, but I wonder if
the hint zone is the correct (elegant?) way to solve this problem.
I thought forward & forwarders would have been a better
solution, but i can't make it work.
Any advice ?
TYA
--
Michel Marcon SysAdmin
(but not very Bind fluent...)
cmi |at| caramail |dot| com
More information about the bind-users
mailing list